#TABULA RASA CRIMINAL MINDS FREE#

It is from this presumption of a free, self-authored mind combined with an immutable human nature that the Lockean doctrine of 'natural' rights derives.

#TABULA RASA CRIMINAL MINDS FREE#

Each individual was free to define the content of his or her character, but his or her basic identity as a member of the human species cannot be so altered. As understood by Locke, tabula rasa meant that the mind of the individual was born 'blank,' and it also emphasized the individual's freedom to author his or her own soul. The notion is central to Lockean empiricism. In John Locke's philosophy, tabula rasa was the theory that the (human) mind is at birth a 'blank slate' without rules for processing data, and that data is added and rules for processing are formed solely by one's sensory experiences. Our modern idea of the theory is mostly attributed to John Locke's empirical epistemology of the late seventeenth century, though Locke himself used the expression of “white paper” instead in his Essay on Human Understanding (“tabula rasa” only appears in the original French translation of the work). Bonaventure was one of Aquinas' fiercest intellectual opponents, offering some of the strongest arguments towards the Platonic idea of the mind.) This notion sharply contrasted with the previously held Platonic notions of the human mind as an entity that pre-existed somewhere in the heavens, before being sent down to join a body here on Earth (see Plato's Phaedo and Apology, as well as others). In the thirteenth century, Thomas Aquinas brought the Aristotelian notion back to the forefront of modern thought.

However, besides some arguments by the Stoics and Peripatetics, the Aristotelian notion of the mind as a blank state went much unnoticed for nearly 1,800 years, though it reappears in a slightly different wording in the writings of various thinkers. In the fourth century B.C.E., Aristotle originated the idea in De Anima.

Tabula rasa criminal minds